Kandasamy v. The Executive Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01.10.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA & M.P.No.1 of 2014 Kandasamy ... Petitioner -vsThe Executive Officer, Perundurai Town Panchayat, Perundurai.

...Respondent

Prayer : Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records or proceedings in Na.Ka.No.360/2013/A2 dated 31.10.2013 on the file of the respondent herein and quash the same and further direct the respondent herein to renew and extend the lease period to this petitioner with respect of Cycle stand.

* * * For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance.

1/3

O R D E R

On 29.09.2020, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, in order to give one more opportunity to the petitioner to argue the case, the matter was directed to be listed on 01.10.2020 under the caption 'For Dismissal'. Even today (i.e. on 01.10.2020), when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner either in person or through counsel. There is also no representation for the respondent.

2. Hence this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 01.10.2020 asr/srn To The Executive Officer, Perundurai Town Panchayat, Perundurai.

2/3

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

Asr/srn & M.P.No.1 of 2014 11.09.2020 3/3