Munusamy v. The Inspector Of Police

BAIL SLIP Munusamy, son of Shri Narashiman, Aged 40 yrs, Accused in Crl.A.No.45/2014 on the file of Principal Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur confirmed the order of conviction dated 17.03.2014 in CC.No.156 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri, was released on Bail vide order dated 23.09.2014 made in MP 1 of 2014 in Crl.RC.No.975 of 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.11.2021 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL.R.C. NO.975 OF 2014 Munusamy ... Petitioner

Versus

State rep. By Inspector of Police, GNT Road Traffic Investigation, Madavaram Police Station.

(Crime No.66 of 2013) ... Respondent Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order dated 18.09.2014 made in Crl.A.No.45 of 2014 on the file of the Learned Principal Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur, confirming the order of conviction dated 17.03.2014 in C.C.No.156 of 2013 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri and acquit the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Manoharan For Respondent : Mr.L.Bhaskaran, Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

This Crl.R.C.No.975 of 2014 is filed by the petitioner/accused, aggrieved by the conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri, in C.C. No.156 of 2013 by Judgment dated 17.03.2014, thereby convicting him for the offence under Sections 279, 304(A) of IPC., which was modified by Judgment passed by the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur in Crl.A.No.45 of 2014, dated 18.09.2014, thereby confirming the conviction and sentence imposed for the offence under Section 279 of IPC., and confirming the sentence under Section 304(A) of IPC., but, however reducing the imprisonment term from 6 months to 3 months. 2.Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel on either side submit that pursuant to the dismissal of the appeal, already the petitioner had also undergone the sentence and he has also taken his original license from the respondent/police.

3.Under these circumstances, nothing further which remains to be decided in the Criminal Revision Case and the same is dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar klt To 1.

The Principal Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur.

2.

The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri.

3.

The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.

The Inspector of Police, GNT Road Traffic Investigation, Madavaram Police Station, Chennai.(Crime No.66 of 2013) The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court, Madras-104.

6.

The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

Crl.R.C. No.975 of 2014 RGN(CO) PM/01/07/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/