K.Srinivasa Rao v. Rukmani

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:05.07.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A.No.2272 of 2004 K.Srinivasa Rao ...Appellant Vs.

1.Rukmani 2.Vijayalakshmi 3.Anuradha 4.Seetharani 5.M.K.Bhatt (set exparte in Trial Court)

...Respondents

Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment passed in A.S.No.38 of 2003 (A.S.No.100 of 2001) dated 16.03.2004 on the file of the District Judge, Cuddalore reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.416 of 1993 dated 10.04.2001 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge,Cuddalore.

For Appellant : Mr.R.Thiyagarajan For Respondents : Mr.R.Gururaj

J U D G M E N T

Both counsel present 2.Joint memo filed by the counsel for the appellant as well as the respondents informing that the matter had been settled out of the Court and accordingly prays that the Second Appeal may be dismissed as settled out of Court. The above said memo is taken on record.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.In the light of the above position, the second appeal is dismissed as settled out of Court. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mfa To

1. The District Judge, Cuddalore.

2.The Additional Subordinate Judge, Additional Subordinate Court, Cuddalore.

Copy to The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Chennai.

+1cc Mr.R.Gururaj, Advocate Sr.43888 S.A.No.2272 of 2004 kji[co] srg 17/07/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/