M.V.Kaliyappan v. The District Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.7652 of 2004 M.V.Kaliyappan ... Petitioner vs.

1.

The District Collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri - 5.

2.

The Tahsildar, Palacode, Dharmapuri District.

3.

The Commissioner, Palacode Panchayat Union, Palacode, Dharmapuri District.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Declaration, declaring the order of the 1st respondent vide Na.Ka.No.7943/2003/A-1, dated 10.01.2004 and the consequential notice issued by the 2nd respondent vide Na.Ka.No.454/2004/E2, dated 27.01.2004, as illegal and contrary to law. For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Thamarai Selvan For Respondents 1 & 2 :

Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali, Government Advocate For 3rd Respondent :

Mr.V.Subbarayan http://www.judis.nic.in

S.VAIDYANATHAN,J.

(aeb)

O R D E R

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought in this Writ Petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect.

2.

Recording the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected W.P.M.P.No.9059 of 2004 is closed. aeb 06.07.2017 To:

1.

The District Collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri - 5.

2.

The Tahsildar, Palacode, Dharmapuri District.

3.

The Commissioner, Palacode Panchayat Union, Palacode, Dharmapuri District.

Order in W.P.No.7652 of 2004 http://www.judis.nic.in