G.Arjunan, v. The Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 01.06.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.No.21915 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.18756 of 2016 G.Arjunan

...Petitioner

Vs.

The Commissioner, Maillikundam Panchayat, Mettur Taluk, Salem District.

...Respondent

Prayer: This writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ particularly in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the lands in S.Nos.558/2, 558/3, 558/4A and 561, in Mellikundam Village, under the guise of laying road without following due process of law.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.S.Diwakar Special Government Pleader

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In fact, even on the last occasion, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar cse https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Commissioner, Maillikundam Panchayat, Mettur Taluk, Salem District.

W.P.No.21915 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.18756 of 2016 GJ(CO) RS(19/06/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/