N.Narasimmamurthy v. Pravin B.Nayar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19.03.2019 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.SARAVANAN Cont. Petition No.3260 of 2014 N.Narasimmamurthy ..

Petitioner vs.

Pravin B.Nayar, The Sub Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

..

Respondent Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for the wilful disobedience of the orders of this Court passed in W.P.No.26871 of 2013 dated 11.02.2014 and punish the respondent.

For Petitioner ..

Mr.S.Duraisamy For Respondent ..

Mr.P.S.Sivashanmugha Sundaram, Spl. Govt. Pleader

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) Alleging that the order dated 11.02.2014 passed by this Court in W.P.No.26971 of 2013 has not been complied with, the present contempt petition has been filed. 2.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ submit that the earlier order passed with respect to the relatives of the petitioner has not been considered

properly. On a perusal of the order, it is seen that it has been observed therein that the petitioner has to produce the certificate proving the nature of relationship between himself and the other persons. This favourable order he seeks to rely upon. The impugned order cannot be termed as a wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court. If the petitioner has got any grievance, he can very well challenge the aforesaid order in the manner known to law. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed, giving liberty to the petitioner to put to challenge the order passed by the Sub Collector, Hosur, if so advised. SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) mmi //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2019. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

THS/10/04/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/