Smt.A.Shakila, v. The Commissioner,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.01.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.No.32021 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 A.Shakila

...Petitioner

Versus

1. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Chennai-600 003.

2. The Revenue Officer, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Chennai-600 003.

.. Respondents Prayers: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari, call for the records relevant to the notice dated 20.11.2013 issued under Section 287 Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act 4 of 1919 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal, improper, arbitrary against the act, total non application of mind and totally against the natural justice and without jurisdiction.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kumaresan For Respondents : Mr. R. Arunmozhi

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition as the same has become infructuous and also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rpl https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Chennai-600 003.

2. The Revenue Officer, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Chennai-600 003.

+1cc to Mr.R.Arunmozhi, Advocate SR.No.5158 +1cc to Mr.S.Kumaresan, Advocate SR.No.5926 W.P.No.32021 of 2013 GP(CO) GN(19/02/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/