← Library
Madras High CourtWP/6939/2014dismissed for nonprosecution

C.Lakshmana Gowda v. The Presiding Officer,

2019-07-17Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17.07.2019 CORAM :

The Hon'ble Mrs.VIJAYA.K.TAHILRAMANI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P. No.6939 of 2014 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 1.C.Lakshmanan Gowda 2.Vasudeva Gowda .. Petitioners -vs1.The Presiding Officer, DRAT, Chennai.

2.The Manager, Central Bank of India, Gandhi Nagar Branch, Bangalore.

3.The Authorized Officer, Central Bank of India, Bangalore Regional Office, No.20, Crescent Road, Bangalore 560 001.

4.R.S.Padma .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai, the 1st respondent herein and quash the order dated 23.01.2014 made in AIR (SA) 813/2010 under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act and direct the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai to number and consider the appeal filed by the petitioners on merits without insisting on payment of court fee as per Rule 13(2)(d) and filing of waiver application u/s.18 of the SARFAESI Act within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

For Petitioners :

No appearance For Respondents :

R-1 Tribunal :

Mr.P.V.Ramachandran for RR 2 & 3 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) There is no representation for the petitioners. So also, on the earlier two dates, i.e., on 02.07.2019 and 27.06.2019, there was no representation for the petitioners. 2.In the order dated 02.07.2019, it is reflected that there was no representation for the petitioners on that date, so also on the earlier date, i.e., 27.06.2019, hence, the matter be posted for dismissal on 17.07.2019, i.e., today. 3.As stated earlier, today also, there is no representation for the petitioners.

Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 are also dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sra To 1.The Presiding Officer, DRAT, Chennai.

W.P.No.6939 of 2014 LN(CO) GN(02/08/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/