← Library
Madras High CourtWP/18061/2022withdrawn dismissed

K.Ramesh v. The Managing Director

2024-01-09Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.01.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.Nos.18061 & 18063 of 2022 and WMP.Nos.17399, 17400, 17402, 17403, 17404 & 17405 of 2022 WP.No.18061 of 2022 K.Ramesh ... Petitioner Vs.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in pursuant to the proceedings of the third respondent in 1/6

Na.Ka.No.651/A1/2019 dated 27.06.2022 and to quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and unjust in law and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in the post of Supervisor. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jothikumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Balakrishnan, Standing Counsel for TASMAC WP.No.18063 of 2022 N.Rajendiran ... Petitioner Vs.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the 2/6

records in pursuant to the proceedings of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.651/A1/2019 dated 27.06.2022 and to quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and unjust in law and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in the post of Supervisor. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jothikumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Balakrishnan, Standing Counsel for TASMAC COMMON ORDER Both the writ petitions have been filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in pursuant to the proceedings of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.651/A1/2019 dated 27.06.2022 and to quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and unjust in law and consequently to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioners in the post of Supervisor.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petitions and he has also made endorsement to that effect.

3/6

3.

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, both the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

09.01.2024 Internet: Yes Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order lok 4/6

To

4. The Government Advocate, High Court, Madras.

5/6

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

lok 09.01.2024 6/6