Dhansekharen v. The State Rep. By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.06.2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.No.16236 of 2019

1. Mr.Dhansekharen

2. Mrs.Sasirekha ... Petitioners -VsThe State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, T13, Kundrathur Police Station, Kancheepuram District ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner in view of the above said circumstances. For Petitioners : Mr.Palanichamy.C.P For respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public prosecutor

ORDER

The grievance of the petitioners is that there is a Civil dispute between the parties and the respondent police is issuing summons under Section 91 & 160 of Cr.PC for appearance of the petitioners even without registering an FIR and therefore, the summon itself is not sustainable. 2.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the respondent police will take a decision with regard to registration of FIR within a short time, if the complaint makes out a cognizable offence and thereafter, will proceed in accordance with law.

3.

Recording the submissions of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rka/msrm https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, T13, Kundrathur Police Station, Kancheepuram District 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.C.P.Palanichamy, Advocate, S.R.No.51931 Crl.O.P.No.16236 of 2019 PPA(CO) RRS(19/07/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/