Madras High CourtWP/3901/2015withdrawn dismissed

Thanga. Mayil Vaganan, v. The Government Of Tamil Nadu,

2015-02-16Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.02.2015

CORAM

The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.No.3901 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 Thanga Mayil Vaganan Regional President - Ariyalur, South Indian Human Rights Protection Kazhagam, Sendurai Taluk, Ariyalur District.

.. Petitioner -vs1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Dept., Fort St. George, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Director of Panchayat, Ezhilagam, Chennai.

3.The District Collector, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Udayarpalayam, Ariyalur District.

5.The Tahsildar, Udayarpalayam, Ariyalur District.

6.The Tahsildar, Sendurai Taluk, Ariyalur District.

7.The Tahsildar, Jeyankondam Taluk, Ariyalur District.

8.The President, Kazhumangalam Panchayat, Udayarpalayam Post, Sendurai Taluk, Ariyalur District.

.. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relevant to the order in Na.Ka. U3/4744/2013 dated 06.01.2015 passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same as illegal improper

unreasonable arbitrary and natural justice and thereby direct the respondents 1 to 4 (a) to transfer the Kazhumangalam Panchayat from the jurisdiction of Sendurai Taluk to Udayarpalayam Taluk for the benefits of people of the Kazhumangalam Panchayat for all purpose (b) to lay road from Kazhumangalam to Udayarpalayam for the benefits of Kazhumangalam Village People and (c) to arrange and start a new transport facility from Kazhumangalam to Udayarpalayam and other places and complete the same within a stipulated period of time pursuant to the report of the 4th respondent, Revenue Divisional Officer, Udayarpalayam in her report in Na.Ka.A2/1063/2012 dated 17.06.2013.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.V.Muralidaran For Respondents : Mr.S.T.S.Moorthy Govt. Pleader for RR 1 to 8

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, we are of the view that the issues raised are best pursued on the administrative side, as there are no finances available with this Court to redress the grievances of the petitioner - apart from the fact that these are matters purely within administrative domain and there are elected representatives at different spheres to take up the grievances of the residents. Learned counsel for the petitioner, thus, seeks to withdraw the writ petition to pursue the matter administratively.

2.Writ Petition is, thus, dismissed as withdrawn in terms aforesaid. No costs. Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2015 is also dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sra To 1.The Secretary, Revenue Dept., Fort St. George, Secretariat, Chennai.