Selvaraj v. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.11.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN Crl OP.No.18072 of 2020 Selvaraj S/o. Vengu
...Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Maduranthakam Kancheepuram District
2. Inspector of Police Maduranthakam Police Station
...Respondents
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.PC praying to alter the offences 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(2) IPC and include Sections 3(1) (r) and (s) of SC/ST Prevention of Atrocity (Amended) Act in Crime No.1827/2020 and file a final report and may pass any other order or order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.
For Petitioner : Mr. P.C. Thiyagu For Respondents : Ms. M. Prabhavathi Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The Criminal Original Petition has been laid by the petitioner for direction to the respondent to include the offence punishable under Sections 3(1) (r) and (s) of SC/ST Prevention of Atrocity (Amended) Act in Crime No.1827/2020 and file a final report.
2. Based on the complaint preferred by the petitioner dated 17.10.2020, it is noted that the case in Crime No. 1827/2020 has been registered by the respondent police punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(2) IPC.
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the offence under Sections 3(1) (r) and (s) of SC/ST Prevention of Atrocity (Amended) Act, has not been included and contended that inasmuch as the ingredient of the aforestated offence has been made out in the complaint, the respondent is bound to include the said offence in addition to the other offences already registered by them.
4. However, on a reading of the complaint lodged by the petitioner dated 17.10.2020, it is seen that there is no whisper, as such, that the complainant's son had been abused by the accused hurling abuses by using caste remarks etc., and merely because the complainant is a member of the Scheduled Caste / Scheduled Tribe, when there is no averment in the complaint that the accused had, with an intention, humiliated the complainant's son on account of the complainant's son belonging to Scheduled Caste / Scheduled Tribe, the offence under Sections 3(1) (r) and (s) of SC/ST Prevention of Atrocity (Amended) Act, cannot be held to be made out.
5. In such view of the matter, the contention put forth by the petitioner that the respondent should be directed to include the offence under Sections 3(1) (r) and (s) of SC/ST Prevention of Atrocity (Amended) Act in the FIR, as such, cannot be countenanced.
6. When no material or ingredient is mentioned for invoking the offence under Sections 3(1) (r) and (s) of SC/ST Prevention of Atrocity (Amended) Act, the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be entertained.
7. For the reasons aforestated, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CJ conf) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar bga Copy to
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Maduranthakam
2. Inspector of Police Maduranthakam Police Station
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.P.G.Thiyagu, Advocate SR.37202 Crl OP.No.18072 of 2020 PVS(CO) CB(14/12/2020)