The Management Of Rohini v. The Presiding Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 08.06.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.P.Nos.3108 & 3112 of 2014 The Management, Rohini Mills Private Limited Indiampalayam Arasur Post Sathyamangalam Taluk Erode District

...Petitioner.

Vs.

1.The Presiding Officer 2.P.Thirumoorthy

...Respondents.

Prayer in W.P.No.3108 of 2014: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorari to call for the records from the file of the first respondent herein in I.A.No.175 of 2010 in I.D.No.90 of 2010 and quash its order dated 29.09.2013. 1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Manikandan For Respondents For R1 : -NA- For R2 : Mr.M.D.Nasarullah W.P.No.3112 of 2014 The Management, Rohini Mills Private Limited Indiampalayam Arasur Post Sathyamangalam Taluk Erode District.

...Petitioner.

Vs.

1.The Presiding Officer 2.Mr.M.K.Duraisamy

...Respondents.

Prayer in W.P.No.3112 of 2014: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorari to call for the records from the file of the first respondent herein in I.A.No.179 of 2010 in I.D.No.94 of 2010 and quash its order dated 29.09.2013. 2/4

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Manikandan For Respondents For R1 : Court For R2 : Mr.M.D.Nasarullah

O R D E R

The petitioners in both the writ petitions are the same. The petitioners have settled the matter with the respondent workmen. In order to substantiate the same, they have filed the joint memo of compromise into Court.

2. I have gone through the compromise report. The same is in accordance with law. It is not unlawful or illegal.

3. Hence these writ petitions stand disposed, recording the compromise entered between the parties. No Costs.

08.06.2023 (3/3) nst Index : Yes/No Speaking : Yes/No 3/4

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J nst To:

The Presiding Officer W.P.Nos.3108 & 3112 of 2014 08.06.2023 4/4