T. Jarina Fathul v. Vasantha Kokilam

C.M.P.No.12217 of 2023 in THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) We have heard Mr.Mukund, learned Senior Counsel for the applicant, Dr.A.Thiagarajan, learned Senior Counsel for the writ petitioners and Mr.Veeraraghavan, learned counsel for the Housing Board.

2. The applicant claims interest in the property that was the subject matter of the writ petition. The applicant claims that the Housing Board has executed a sale deed in favour of the applicant on 23.10.2020 and the applicant has paid consideration amount to the Housing Board.

3. According to learned Senior Counsel for the original writ petitioners, the allotment was already made in favour of the writ

petitioners' father way back in the year 1987. In view of that, no further transaction could have been entered into by the Housing Board in favour of the applicant.

4. These are the contentions to be considered on merits. It appears that the applicant seeks leave to appeal inasmuch as she also claimed rights over the property. Considering the documents placed on record, it appears that the applicant has made out a case for grant of leave to appeal.

5. In the light of that, the applicant is granted leave to file an appeal against the impugned order. The application is allowed and disposed of.

(S.V.G., CJ.) (P.D.A.,J.) 11.07.2023 kpl

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.

(kpl) 11.07.2023