S. Syed Nayeemul Rahiman v. The Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.12.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.11148 of 2014 S.Syed Nayeemul Rahiman ...

Petitioner Vs.

1. The Commissioner, Revenue Development (Land Allotment) Ezhilagam, Chennai - 600 005.

2. The District Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.

3. The Tahsildar, Chengalpet Region, Chengalpet.

...

Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for an issuance of writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 27.03.2012. For Petitioner : Mr.B.L.Jayakandan For Respondents : Mr.R.S.Selvam Nos.1 to 3 Government Advocate

ORDER

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal" today i.e. on 20.12.2019. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has to get instructions. Even on the last hearing i.e., on 16.12.2019, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition. 1/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sms To

1. The Commissioner, Revenue Develoment (Land Allotment) Ezhilagam, Chennai - 600 005.

2. The District Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.

3. The Tahsildar, Chengalpet Region, Chengalpet.

+1cc to Government Pleader SR.NO. 106783 W.P.No.11148 of 2014 vgii(co) nr 14/02/2020 2/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/