Guber @ Guber Karthik v. State Rep By

Crl.OP.No.16580 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No. 16580 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 352 and 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.354 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity and land dispute, there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant. It is also alleged that the petitioner along with other accused abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and attacked him with hands. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and no way connected with the alleged offence. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner is having 3 previous cases against him. Hence he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP.No.16580 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

mn

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is very much required in this case. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 18.07.2022 mn Crl.O.P.No.16580 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis