← Library
Madras High CourtWP/17055/2018dismissed as infructuous

Air Media Network Private Ltd v. Union Of India,Rep By Its

2022-01-07Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07.01.2022

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.Nos.17055 to 17057 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.20302 to 20304 of 2018 AIR Media Network Private Limited., Represented by its Manager, Namachivayam,

...Petitioner in all W.Ps

Vs 1.Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram.

... Respondents in W.P.No.17055 of 2018 1.Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur.

... Respondents in W.P.No.17056 of 2018

1.Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.

... Respondents in W.P.No.17057 of 2018 Prayer in W.P.No.17055 of 2018 Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, prayed for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to permit the petitioner Company to provide Analogue Signal to its customers, to whom set top box is not provided, until the petitioner's company provide set top box to all its customers like similarly placed Multi System Operators from its control room at Kanchipuram District.

Prayer in W.P.No.17056 of 2018 Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, prayed for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to permit the petitioner Company to provide Analogue Signal to its customers, to whom set top box is not provided, until the petitioner's company provide set top box to all its customers like similarly placed Multi System Operators from its control room at Tiruvallur District.

Prayer in W.P.No.17057 of 2018 Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, prayed for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to permit the petitioner Company to provide Analogue Signal to its customers, to whom set top box is not provided, until the petitioner's company provide set top box to all its customers like similarly placed Multi System Operators from its control room at Ariyalur District.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.Janarthanan.

Senior Panel Central Government Standing Counsel For R3 :

Mr.M.Shahjahan Special Government Pleader

COMMON ORDER When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in these Writ Petitions have become infructuous. 2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rst To 1.The Secretary Union of India, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram.

4.The District Collector / Nodal Officer, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur.

5.The District Collector / Nodal Officer, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.

W.P.Nos.17055 to 17057 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.20302 to 20304 of 2018 GPL(CO) SB(09/02/2022)