Madras High CourtCONT P/2741/2013closed

K.Sumathi v. Phanindra Reddy

2017-11-10Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.11.2017 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM Contempt Petition No.2741 of 2013 1.Tmt.K.Sumathi 2.K.P.Anandhan 3.B.Antony Raj 4.P.Rajkumar 5.P.Rajendran 6.N.Balakrishnan 7.P.Chellapandi 8.A.Kavitha 9.M.Ramadasu 10.P.V.Selvaraj 11.S.Gobinath 12.B.Arulsamy 13.Dr.M.N.Shivdev Kumar 14.B.Nainar 15.S.Muthukrishnaveni 16.S.P.Ramesh 17.B.Parivallal 18.M.Subbaiah 19.M.Shoba ...

Petitioners Vs.

1. Mr.Phanindra Reddy, Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department, Fort St.Geroge, Chennai -9.

2. Chandrakanth B.Kamble, The Commissioner, Commissionerate of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

3. V.Chandrasekaran, Managing Director, The Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

4. Dr.R.Selvaraj, The Director of Town Panchayat, Chennai - 600 108.

5. Vikram Kapur, The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai - 3.

6. G.Latha The Commissioner, Corporation of Coimbatore, Coimbatore.

7. Natarajan, The Commissioner, Corporation of Madurai, Madurai.

8. Lakshmi, The Regional Director, Municipal Administration, Chengalpattu.

9. Kubendran, The Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Vellore.

10. Poonkodi Arumaikar, The Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Salem.

11. Prema, The Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Tiruppur.

12. Shanthi, The Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Thanjavur.

...

Respondents Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents herein for committing contempt of the order dated 9.4.2013 in W.P.No.26795 of 2012.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Rajasekaran For Respondents : Mr.K.Dhananjayan, Special Government Pleader, for R1,2,4 & 8 to 12.

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states the against the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.26795 of 2012, dated 9.4.2013, the respondents preferred W.A.No.143/2014, dated 10.8.2015 and the same is pending for adjudication.

2.Thus, no further adjudication is required in this contempt petition. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed.

SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) ms //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2018. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

CO/23/01/2018 one cc to the Government Pleader,SR.No.13526.