Ranjith Kumar @ Katta Ranjith v. State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirty First day of August Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.15602 of 2021 RANJITH KUMAR @ KATTA RANJITH [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E3 MINJUR POLICE STATION, TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.514/2021.

For Petitioner : M/S. M.PURUSHOTHAMAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- (The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 448, 294(b), 387, 392, 506(2) and 397 of IPC in Crime No.514 of 2021 seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant who is working as a Site Incharge at PST Engineering Construction's Site Office. On 19.06.2021 at about 6p.m., one unknown person suddenly entered into his site office and he had warned the defacto complainant and on 02.07.

2021, 4 unknown persons have entered into the site office and stated that they are the rowdy elements and was known to the petitioner and threatened him with knife point and robbed a sum of Rs.2,000/- and they have continuously threatening the defacto complainant by stating that without any mediation talks with the petitioner work should not be started. Hence, the complaint. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the petitioner in this case has been arrayed as A2. He is a history sheeter and belongs to A+category and there are six previous cases are pending against the petitioner and all are similar in nature.

5. Considering the submissions on either side and the fact that six previous cases pending against the petitioner, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 31/08/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E3 MINJUR POLICE STATION, TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT.

CC to M/S. M.PURUSHOTHAMAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.15602/2021 Date :31/08/2021 RW 05/10/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/