← Library
Madras High CourtWP/18012/2019disposed of

S.Vinothkumar v. The State

2019-07-05Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.07.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No. 18012 of 2019 Mr.S.Vinothkumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The state Represented by Inspector of Police, M2, milk colony, Madhavaram Police Station, Chennai - 600 051.

2. Mr. Duraivel,

3. C. Vinoth Kumar,

4. C. Vithyasagar ... Respondents PRAYER: This Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India forbearing the 1st respondent from interfering with the Civil dispute between the petitioner and the 2nd to 4th respondents in respect of Mango Grove to an extent of acre 32 in survey No.205/2 in Madhavaram Village / Madhurasekkadu village originally within the jurisdiction of Saidapet Taluk now forming part of Madhavaram Taluk / Periasekkadu Village Chennai District within in the registration district of North Chennai District within in the registration District of North Chennai as claimed by the petitioner in the complaint dated 17.06.2019 and for other reliefs. For Petitioner : Mr.K. Mohana Murali For Respondents 1 : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor For Respondent 2 to 4 : Mr.N.Kumara Rajan

O R D E R

The petitioner prays for directing the the 1st respondent not to interfere with the Civil dispute between the petitioner and the 2nd to 4th respondents in respect of Mango Grove to an extent of acre 32 in survey No.205/2 in Madhavaram Village / Madhurasekkadu village originally within the hurisdiction of Saidapet Taluk now forming part of Madhavaram Taluk / https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Periasekkadu Village Chennai District within in the registration district of North Chennai District within in the registration District of North Chennai as claimed by the petitioner in the complaint dated 17.06.2019 and for other reliefs.

2. The learned Additional Public prosecutor on instructions submitted that the complaint was given by the petitioner and the same was taken on file in C.S.R.No.264 of 2019. Similarly, the 3rd respondent had given a complaint against the petitioner and the same was taken on file in C.S.No.264 of 2019. Both the complaints were enquired and closed on 17.06.2019.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public prosecutor and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 2 to 4. 4.

Recording the submissions made by the learned Additional public prosecutor it is made clear that the petitioner and respondents 2 to 4 shall only agitate their rights before the competent civil Court and the police shall not entertain any complaint from the parties with regard to the property dispute. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To The Inspector of Police, M2, milk colony, Madhavaram Police Station, Chennai - 600 051.

+3cc to Mr.K.Mohanamurali, Advocate Sr.56431 +1cc to Mr.N.Kumar Rajan, Advocate Sr.56252 W.P.No. 18012 of 2019 vba[co] srg 19/07/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/