← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/14595/2025granted

R.Sarath @ Sarath Kumar v. State Rep By. The Inspector Of Police

2025-05-14Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.05.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR R.Sarath @ Sarath Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

State rep. by The Inspector of Police Sirupakkam Police Station, Cuddalore District. Crime No. 115 of 2023.

... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner on bail pending investigation in Crime No. 115 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner :

Mr.M.D.Ilayaraja For Respondent :

Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.04.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 4(1)(aaa) and 4(1-A) of TNP Act, , in connection with Crime No.115 of 2023, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.

1/5

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has illegally kept illicit liquor for the purpose of sale to the general public and the respondent police have seized the said liquor from the petitioner. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submitted that the petitioner is in no way connected with the alleged offence, however, he is suffering incarceration from 13.04.2025. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing for grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner was in illegal possession of 110 litres of ID arrack and he was arrested on 13.04.2025 . He further submitted that there are three previous cases pending against him.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 2/5

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegations, submissions made by the learned counsels on either side and the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Vridhachalam, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for further interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required; [d] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the de facto complainant and witnesses; [e] the petitioner to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for police 3/5

custody beyond the first fifteen days, he shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard; [f] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

14.05.2025 nr Note:

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

4/5

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

nr To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.I Vridhachalam.

2. The Inspector of Police Sirupakkam Police Station, Cuddalore District.

3. The Superintendent, District Prison, Cuddalore.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

14.05.2025.

5/5