Rajini v. State Rep.By, The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.05.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Rajini ... Petitioner Vs.

State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Gudiyatham Taluk Police Station, Gudiyatham, Vellore District.

(Crime No.53 of 2025).

... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent Police in Crime No.53 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent.

For Petitioner :

Mr.Vinodh Kumar For Respondent :

Dr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(A), 4(1)(C), 4(1-A)(ii) of Tamil 1/6

Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, in Crime No.53 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused was found to be in illegal possession of 30 litres of ID arrack. Hence the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submitted that the petitioner, without prejudice to the defence and contention, is ready and willing to deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/- to any welfare scheme of the Government or any other organization. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the illicit arrack was seized from the petitioner.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the voluntary submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) as non-refundable deposit, to the credit of 2/6

Manolaya, Home for Mentally Ill Destitute, Bank Name: Indian Overseas Bank, Branch: Kottaram, IFSC Code: IOBA0000253, Account Name: Manolaya, Account No.025302000000284, UPI ID: 6379484925@okbizicici, Gpay:9443307196, without prejudice to the right of defence before the Trial Court and making it clear that it would not amount to admission of guilt.

7. Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegations, submissions made by the learned counsels on either side and considering the fact that the petitioner without prejudice to his rights, on his own volition, is ready and willing to contribute some amount to any charitable trust, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

8. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further 3/6

condition that:

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for further interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

09.05.2025 at 4/6

Note :

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham.

2. The Inspector of Police, Gudiyatham Taluk Police Station, Gudiyatham, Vellore District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

5/6

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

at 09.05.2025 6/6