Dharanraj v. The State Rep By Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.05.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL.O.P.No.14589 of 2025 Dharanraj ... Petitioner

Versus

The State rep by, The Inspector of Police, J-1, Saidapet Police Station, Chennai.

(Crime No.74 of 2025) .. Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS Act, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police pending investigation in Crime No.74 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr.Anand Kumar For Respondent : Dr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/6

O R D E R

The petitioner, apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 118(1) of BNS and under Section 4 of TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002 in Crime No.74 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that, due to previous enmity, petitioner along with other accused abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and also attacked with hands. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that due to previous enmity, petitioner abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and also attacked with hands. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/6

5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made on either side, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the IX Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for further interrogation; 3/6

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

08.05.2025 sma Note :

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

4/6

To

1. IX Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai.

2. The Inspector of Police, J-1, Saidapet Police Station, Chennai.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

5/6

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

Sma 08.05.2025 6/6