Padmavathy v. Tamizh Arasi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.07.2021

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN S.A.No.365 of 2014 and C.M.P.Nos.13933 of 2016 & 7146 of 2016 Padmavathy ... Appellant Vs.

1.Tamizh Arasi 2.Udhaya Shankar 3.Selvi @ Kalaiselvi ... Respondents Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No.34 of 2012 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram dated 28.06.2013 confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.37 of 2009 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Chidambaram dated 10.10.2012. For Appellant : Mr.G.Surya Narayanan For Respondents : Mr.A.Muthukumar for R1 & R2

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the dispute has been settled between the parties through mediation and therefore nothing survives for adjudication in this appeal. Recording the same, this Second Appeal is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar arb https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To:

1.The Subordinate Judges , Chidambaram.

2.The Principal District Munsif , Chidambaram.

+1 CC to Mr.A.Muthukumar, Advocate, Sr.No.33682 S.A.No.365 of 2014 and C.M.P.Nos.13933 of 2016 & 7146 of 2016 NK (CO) CT (09/09/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/