N.Mathivanan, v. The Tahsildar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.11.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.No.12193 of 2013 N.Mathivanan .. Petitioner vs.

1.The Tahsildar, Maduranthangam Taluk, Maduranthangam, Kancheepuram District.

2.N.Thiyagarajan .. Respondents Prayer : - Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation letter dated 31.07.2012, to initiate an enquiry by the 1st respondent.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.Balamurugan, GA

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 30.04.2013 and 03.11.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "For Dismissal" on 25.11.2016. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person or through the learned counsel on record. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. -s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Tahsildar, Maduranthangam Taluk, Maduranthangam, Kancheepuram District.

+1 cc to Government Pleader sr 69697/16 W.P.No.12193 of 2013 kgk(co) aa02/01/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/