Madras High CourtCRP/920/2016dismissed as infructuous

Kuttapatty Panchayat v. Sengodan

2017-11-28Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.11.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR C.R.P.(PD).No.920 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.5143 of 2016 Kuttapatty Panchayat Rep.by its President, Kuttapatty Village and Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District.

..Petitioner Vs.

1. Sengodan

2. The District Collector, Collectorate, Salem.

3. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Mettur, Salem District.

4. The Block Development Officer, Mettur, Salem District.

..Respondents PRAYER:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and final order of District Munsif Court, Mettur in I.A.No.236 of 2014 in I.A.No.971 of 2009 in O.S.No.252 of 2009 dated 03.07.2015.

http://www.judis.nic.in

D. KRISHNAKUMAR, J., ssn For Petitioner : Mr.A.Sundaravadhanan For 1st Respondent : Mr.S.Raveekumar For Respondents 2 to 4: Mr.T.Jayaramaraj

O R D E R

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that in view of the suit has been withdrawn by the 1st respondent/plaintiff, this civil revision petition itself has now become infructuous. Therefore, nothing survives in the revision petition for further adjudication. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

28.11.2017 ssn To

1. The District Munsif Court, Mettur

2. The District Collector, Collectorate, Salem.

3. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Mettur, Salem District.

4. The Block Development Officer, Mettur, Salem District.

C.R.P.(PD).No.920 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.5143 of 2016 http://www.judis.nic.in