Krithiga v. G. Lokesh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.01.2025 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN & C.M.P.No.12964 of 2024 Krithiga .. Petitioner Vs G.Lokesh .. Respondent Prayer: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of the C.P.C., to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.926 of 2022 pending on the file of the learned III Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee and transfer the same to the file of the learned Family Court, Chennai.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.S.Balasubramanian For Respondent : Mr.M.Rajasekar

O R D E R

This transfer petition is at the instance of the wife. She seeks withdrawal of H.M.O.P.No.926 of 2022 from the file of the learned III Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee and transfer the same to the file of the learned Family Court, Chennai.

2. I heard both sides. I have gone through the affidavit. 1/4

3. The petitioner married the respondent on 17.05.2021. Due to disputes and differences, the parties have separated. The respondent/husband initiated proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.926 of 2022 for divorce before the learned III Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee. Pleading that the wife is residing in Kolathur, Chennai and unable to travel from Kolathur to Poonamallee, she has moved this transfer petition.

4. The Parliament, while amending the Hindu Marriage Act, has incorporated Section 19(iii), permitting a wife to initiate a proceeding in a place where she is residing. This is an indication to the Court that the convenience of the wife has to be given precedence by the Court. In line with this Parliamentary amendment, this Court and the Supreme Court have consistently held in matters of transfer, the convenience of the wife should be given a superior consideration than that of the husband. As the distance between Kolathur to Poonamallee is considerable, I am inclined to accept the transfer.

5.Accordingly, H.M.O.P.No.926 of 2022 is withdrawn from the file of the learned III Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee and transferred to the file of the learned Family Court, Chennai.

2/4

6. The Family Court need not insist upon the appearance of the husband on all hearing dates. For non-essential and procedural hearings, the husband will be represented by a counsel. He shall however present himself before the Court when the Trial Court passes a specific order for his appearance or when his presence is indispensable. 7.With the above observations, the Transfer Petition is ordered. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 24.01.2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order KST To 1.The III Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee.

2.The Family Court, Chennai.

3/4

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.

KST & C.M.P.No.12964 of 2024 24.01.2025 4/4