← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/16723/2022granted

Ilayaraja v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-07-19Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan6 pages

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 366A of IPC, 9 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 and under Section 5(1), 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 in Crime No.19 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that initially the case was registered under Girl Missing Case and thereafter the victim girl was secured with A1 while they return to Gopichettypalayam from Yercaud by police personnel. It is further alleged that A2 is the friend of A1 and he has given shelter to his friend/A1 and the victim girl and he also helped for their elopement Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the 1/5

petitioner is an innocent person and he is the friend of A1 and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner abetted A1 to marry victim and to commit sexual assault to the victim girl. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the above fact and circumstances of the case and also the submissions made by both counsel, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Fast Track Mahila Court, Erode on condition that the petitioner shall 2/5

execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

3/5

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

19.07.2022 vv 4/5

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Vv 19.07.2022 5/5

6/5