← Library
Madras High CourtWP/32233/2013dismissed for nonprosecution

Mr.S.Murugesan v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2017-11-09Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.11.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.32233 of 2013 & M.P.No. 1 of 2013 1.S.Murugesan 2.T.Leelavathi ..Petitioners Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. By Secretary to Government School Education Department Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Director of School Education College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006.

3.The Chief Educational Officer Theni District, Theni.

.. Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the G.O.No.69, School Education (M.1) Department dated 18.04.2013, issued by the 1st respondent, Chennai as unconstitutional, in so far as it denies the benefits of the G.O.216 dated 22.03.1993, to the petitioners on the ground that they have not obtained court order already and direct the respondents to extend the benefits of the G.O.216 Finance (PC) Department dated 22.03.1993 in the light of the order passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.8747 of 2009, dated 14.07.2009, as confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in C.C.No.2746 of 2010 dated 23.04.2010 and as per G.O.Ms.No.562 dated 28.09.1998 and accordingly, award selection/Special Grade Scale of Pay with effect from 10.06.1988 and revision of pensionary benefits and pay arrears and Super Grade Scale of pay to the 1st petitioner with effect from 03.02.2000.

For Petitioners ..No appearnce For Respondents ..Mrs.K.Bhuvaneshwari Govt.Advocate https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

When the Writ Petition was listed for hearing on 07.11.2017, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioners and the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 08.11.2017. Today (09.11.2017) when the matter was called, none appeared for the writ petitioners.

2.In the light of the fact that there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioners, it is evident that the petitioners are not willing to get along with the matter and therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS III ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar rpa To:

1.The Secretary to Government School Education Department Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Director of School Education College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006.

3.The Chief Educational Officer Theni District, Theni.

+1cc to Government Pleader in sr.no.80138 W.P.No.32233 of 2013 GJII(CO) NR 30/11/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/