← Library
Madras High CourtWP/14865/2018allowed

Sanco Trans Ltd., v. The Assistant Commissioner Of

2018-06-20Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :20.06.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.14865 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.17597 of 2018 Sanco Trans Ltd., S.T.Tower, No.24 & 25 2nd line Beach Road, Chennai- 600 001.

Rep by its Managing Director.

..Petitioner vs The Assitant Commissioner of Labour - I (Enforcement) Government of Tamil Nadu, Labour Department, No.33, Venkat Narayana Road, Nandanam, Chennai- 600 035.

..Respondent Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent dated 09.05.2018 in proceedings No.L.R.No.1252/2018 quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Anand for M/s.T.S.Gopalan & Co.

For Respondent : M/s.A.Sri Jayanthi, Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

The order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Labour-I (Enforcement) in proceedings dated 09.05.2018 is under challenge in this writ petition.

2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner made a submission that the writ petitioner had raised number of grounds defending their case. However, the impugned order has been issued without considering any of the grounds raised by the writ petitioner and the order is absolutely non-speaking. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that the impugned order passed by the respondent is non-speaking and the grounds raised are not considered.

3. Thus, this court is of an opinion that it is a fit case for remittance. The authorities exercising the quasi-judicial power are bound to consider the grounds raised and the order passed must be a speaking one. On perusal of the order https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

impugned, this Court is of an opinion that the authority has not considered all the grounds raised and the order passed is non speaking. The judgments relied on by the writ petitioner also have not been considered at the time of passing the impugned order.

4. This being the factum of the case, the order impugned passed by the respondent in proceedings No.L.R.No.1252/2018 dated 09.05.2018 is quashed.

5. The respondents are directed to rehear the matter and to pass a speaking order considering the grounds raised by the writ petitioner within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

6. With the above direction, the writ petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(co) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To The Assitant Commissioner of Labour - I (Enforcement) Government of Tamil Nadu, Labour Department, No.33, Venkat Narayana Road, Nandanam, Chennai- 600 035.

+1cc to Mr.T.S.Gopalan, Advocate Sr.No.38469 +1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.39094 KJI(CO) sm:29.6.2018 W.P.No.14865 of 2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/