← Library
Madras High Court(T)Rev.Pet(IPD)/8/2024dismissed for nonprosecution

M/S. Ronak Bharat Shah v. Hewlett-Packard Development Company

2024-11-21Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose3 pages

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.11.2024

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE (T)Rev. Pet (IPD) No.8 of 2024 and RP No.3 of 2021 in ORA No.29 of 2020 RONAK BHARAT SHAH .... Appellant vs Hewlett - Packard Development Company L.P.

10300 Energy Drive, Spring, TX 77389, United States of America .... 1st respondent The Registrar of Trademarks Boudhik Sampada Bhawan, G.S.T. Road, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032. ..... 2nd respondent Prayer : TRANSFERRED REVIEW PETITION (IPD) has been filed under Rule 23(1) of the Intellectual Property Appellate Board Rules, 2003 [R.P. No.3 of 2021 in ORA No.29 of 2020/TN/CHN in erstwhile IPR Appellate Board and re-numbered as (T) Rev. Pet (IPD) No.8 of 2024] to pray the order, dated 30th December 2020 be reviewed, reversed and registration be reinstated on record and I be given a chance to represent my case and file the counter statement. 1/3

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.A.R. Sakthivel, SPGSC for R2

ORDER

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. There is no representation on the side of the appellant once again. Even on the last hearing date i.e., on 14.11.2024, there was no representation on the side of the appellant. This petition has been filed to review an earlier order passed by this Court. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent is present. It can now be inferred that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this petition. Accordingly, this review petition is dismissed for non prosecution. 21.11.2024 Index: Yes/ No Speaking order / Non speaking order vsi2 2/3

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

vsi2 (T)Rev. Pet (IPD) No.8 of 2024 and RP No.3 of 2021 in ORA No.29 of 2020 21.11.2024 3/3