← Library
Madras High CourtWP/40358/2015disposed of

M/S.Venus Decors v. The Commercial Tax Officer

2016-02-25Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25-02-2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY W.P.Nos.40358 to 40361 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 M/s. Venus Decors Rep. by its Proprietrix New No.101, Choolai High Road Chennai - 600 112 .. Petitioner Vs The Commercial Tax Officer Vepery Assessment Circle No.10, Greams Road Chennai - 6 .. Respondent Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in TIN No.3330524583/2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14, dated 25-11-2015 and quash the same as ultra vires and contrary to law and further direct the respondent to grant an opportunity to the petitioner to place the available materials and consider the same without being influenced by the report of enforcement wing officials and pass orders.

For petitioner :

Mr. C. Rekha Kumari For respondent :

Mr. S. Kanmani Annamalai, AGP (T)

ORDER

The petitioner has filed the above writ petitions to issue writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the respondent in TIN No.3330524583 for the assessment years 201011, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14, dated 25-11-2015 and quash the same as ultra vires and contrary to law and further direct the respondent to grant an opportunity to the petitioner to place the available materials and consider the same without being influenced by the report of enforcement wing officials. 2.

It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent had passed the order without considering the materials available with them. On a perusal of the impugned order, it is clear that sufficient opportunity was given to the petitioner for producing

the documents. However, the petitioner has not produced the documents before the Assessing Officer. Left with no other alternative, the impugned order was passed by the respondent. 3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is having all the documents with them and in the interest of justice, the petitioner may be permitted to produce all the documents before the respondent and in such case, the respondent may be directed to redo the assessment, on merits and in accordance with law.

4.

Mr. Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that though sufficient opportunity was given to the petitioner they failed to produce the documents before the Assessing Officer, which resulted in the impugned order. However, the learned Additional Government Pleader fairly submitted that in the interest of justice, the petitioner can be given one more opportunity to produce the necessary documents before the respondent and the respondent may be directed to decide the matter afresh, in accordance with law.

5.

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, I am of the view that though the respondent has given sufficient opportunity to the petitioner to produce the documents in the interest of justice, the petitioner can be given one more opportunity to produce all the documents available with them and the respondent can be directed to decide the matter afresh. Accordingly, the impugned orders dated 2511-2015 are set aside and the respondent is directed to give an opportunity to the petitioner to produce all the necessary documents and on production of the documents by the petitioner, the respondent is directed to decide the matter afresh, after giving due opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. 6.

With these observations, the writ petitions are disposed of. The petitioner is also permitted to file any additional reply, if necessary. However, such exercise of filing all the necessary documents available with the petitioner and the additional reply, shall be completed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7.

Costs made easy. The connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

-s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar

To 1.

The Commercial Tax Officer Vepery Assessment Circle No.10, Greams Road Chennai - 6 +1 cc to the Special Government Pleader9T) sr.11966 W.P.Nos.40358 to 40361 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 aa18/03/2016