← Library
Madras High CourtWP/11669/2014disposed of

M.Thangaruju, Inspector Of v. The Principal Secretary To

2022-06-21Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 21.06.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WRIT PETITION NO.11669 OF 2014 M.Thangaraju, Inspector of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Thiruthuraipoondi, Thiruvarur District.

Presently working at Inspector of Police, Manur Police Station (Crime), Thirunelveli District.

... Petitioner -Vs1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Thanjavur Range, Thanjavur.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvarur District, District Police Officer Master Plan Complex, Tiruvarur - 610 001.

5. The Additional Superintendent of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Thiruvarur District, Tiruvarur.

... Respondents

PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in connection with the Charge Memo in PR./K2/81/2000 dated 14.09.2000 passed by the 5th respondent herein and the order of punishment PR No.81/2000 dated 24.04.2001 passed by the 4th Respondent herein and the order of rejection on appeal C.No.D2/AP 79/2001 dated 19.11.2001 passed by the 3rd respondent herein and the order of rejection on mercy petition D.Dis.265554/API(1)/2004-1 dated 22.01.2006 passed by the 2nd respondent herein and the order of rejection on special mercy petitioner G.O.(2D) No.416 dated 08.08.2013 passed by the 1st Respondent herein and quash the same consequently direct the respondents to extend all service benefits including increment and promotion to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Dr.R.Sampath Kumar For Respondents : Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

Learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that the petitioner already attained the age of superannuation and his case was considered by the police department, during the pendency of the writ petition and he was allowed to retire from service.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has taken efforts to secure instructions in this regard to get along with the case. But the efforts ended in vain. Thus, the learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to proceed with the case and reported 'No Instructions'. However, the petitioner is at liberty to pursue the remedy, if any grievance exists, as of now.

3. With these liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. No Costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ars

To 1.

The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.

The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

3.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Thanjavur Range, Thanjavur.

4.

The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvarur District, District Police Officer Master Plan Complex, Tiruvarur - 610 001.

5.

The Additional Superintendent of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Thiruvarur District, Tiruvarur.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.38850 W.P.NO.11669 OF 2014 RR(CO) PBS/30/06/2022