Rajendran v. The State Rep By

Crl.OP.No.16871 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.16871 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(2) of IPC, in Crime No.136 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant. It is alleged that the petitioners abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and also attacked him with beer bottle and caused injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and no way connected with the alleged offence. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant with wooden log in knee and beer bottle and caused grievous injuries and the injured is still in hospital. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP.No.16871 of 2022 mn

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the bad antecedents of the petitioners, the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is very much required in this case. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 20.07.2022 mn Crl.O.P.No.16871 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis