Alivelumangamma v. B.Shanmugam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.06.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and O.A.Nos.441 to 443 of 2016 1.Alivelumangamma 2.Gayathri 3.Vaishnavi ... Plaintiffs Vs 1.B.Shanmugam 2.Punjab National Bank rep. by its Manager, Park Town, Chennai - 3.

3.The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer/MAS, Divisional Railway Manager's Office, Personal Branch, MAS Division, Chennai - 3.

... Defendants Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 C.P.C. r/w Order IV Rule 1 of the O.S. Rules.

For Plaintiffs : Ms.Shubashini Suresh for M/s.Chennai Law Associates

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs submits that the dispute has been resolved between the parties and seeks permission to withdraw the suit. Learned counsel has filed a memo of withdrawal dated 14.06.2016 and made an endorsement to that effect. 2.In view of the memo of withdrawal filed by the learned counsel for the plaintiffs and the endorsement made by him, the civil suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected applications are closed.

28.06.2016 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No mmi To The Sub Assistant Registrar, Original Side, High Court, Madras.

M.M.SUNDRESH, J.

This matter is listed today under the caption 'for being mentioned' at the instance of the learned counsel for the plaintiffs. 2.Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs submits that due to oversight, refund of half of the court fee was omitted to be mentioned.

3.Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs, Registry is directed to refund half of the court fee to the learned counsel for the plaintiffs. 26.10.2016 mmi Note: Registry is directed to issue corrected order copy. M.M.SUNDRESH, J.

mmi

26.10.2016