Ms.P.Sukanya, v. State Bank Of Patiala,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ Writ Petition No.22358 of 2016 and WMP No.19066 & 19067 of 2016 P.Sukanya .... Petitioner vs.
State Bank of Patiala Represented by its Authorised Officer Pudur Pirivu Dharapuram Main Road Tirupur 641 608 .... Respondent WRIT Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent comprised in their sale notice dated 01.06.2016 in respect of Sl.No.2 published on 09.06.2016 and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and consequently forbear the respondent from proceeding under the SARFAESI Act.
For Petitioner :Mr.S.Ramesh For Respondents :Mr.Suresh
ORDER
(delivered by S.MANIKUMAR, J) Sale Notice dated 01.06.2016 in respect of Sl.No.2, published on 09.06.2016 is impugned by the legal heir of the borrower. Record of proceedings shows that on 30.06.3016, while ordering notice of admission returnable in 8 weeks, regarding payment, this court has granted an order of interim stay of the impugned sale notice for a period of 8 weeks.
2. Though the writ petitioner made submissions to sustain the challenge on the averments supporting the prayer sought for, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
prima facie, we are of the view that the same has to be done before the forum. Mr.Suresh, learned counsel for the respondent bank submitted that the sale scheduled, did not take place. He has also submitted that, as on today, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Placing on record the above, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to cost. Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed.
sd/ Assistant Registrar(CCC) /true copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar asr +1cc to Mr.S.Ramesh,ADvocate SR.No.3996 W.P.No.22358 of 2016 KJ(CO) GN(09/02/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/