Mr Sanjay Babu v. The State Rep By Its,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.05.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR 1.M.Sanjay Babu 2.M.Pavithra ... Petitioners/A1 & A2 /versus/ State represented by The Inspector of Police, R-10, MGR Nagar Police Station, Chennai 600 083.
Crime No.200 of 2024 ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS Act, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest by the respondent police pending investigation in Crime No.200 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.A.Sahul Hameed For Respondent : Mr.V.Meganathan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ******
O R D E R
1/7
The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 341 and 506(1) of IPC in Crime No.200 of 2024, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners and the defacto complainant are neighbours. The defacto complainant is having a Temple (Samy Peedam) out side his residence. While so, on 10.04.2024, there was a quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant in respect of keeping the pooja items in the "Samy Peedam" during which, the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant by using slippers and groom stick and also threatened the defacto complainant and his wife with dire consequences. Hence the case was registered.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that there is a case in counter in crime No.201 of 2025 against the defacto complainant. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
2/7
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there is no previous case against the petitioners. However he opposed for the grant of anticipatory the bail to the petitioners.
5. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions and accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the Police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that:
[a] if the petitioners fail to surrender before the said 3/7
Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled;
[b] The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;
[c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of 30 days; [d] the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the defacto complainant and witnesses and shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
[e] the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a Police office as and when required; [f] the petitioners to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for Police custody beyond the first fifteen days, he shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard; [g] the petitioners shall not abscond either during 4/7
investigation or trial;
[h] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];
[i] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.
16.05.2025 ssi/at Note:-
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the official website of this Court.
2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in official website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To 1.The XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai.
2.The Inspector of Police, 5/7
R-10, MGR Nagar Police Station, Chennai 600 083.
3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
ssi/at 6/7
16.05.2025 7/7