← Library
Madras High CourtWMP/31209/2019ordered

N.V.R.Krishnan v. The Central Administrative Tribunal

2025-01-21Honourable Mr Justice S. S. Sundar,Honourable Mr Justice Rmt. Teekaa Raman3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21-01-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN WMP NO. 31209 of 2019 AND WMP NO. 31210 OF 2019 in REV.SR Nos. 30342 & 30343 of 2018 N.V.R.Krishnan S/o.S.V.Narayanan, No.6, Gandhi Street, Vanuvampet, Chennai 91 working as Vocational Instructor (Machinist), Central Training Institute, Chennai 32 Petitioner(s) Vs The Central Administrative Tribunal Chennai Bench, Rep by its Registrar, High Court Building, City Civil Court Complex, Chennai and 2 Others Respondent(s) WMP NO. 31210 of 2019 N.V.R.Krishnan S/o.S.V.Narayanan, No.6, Gandhi Street, Vanuvampet, Chennai 91 working as Vocational Instructor (Machinist), Central Training Institute, Chennai 32 Petitioner(s) Vs The Central Administrative Tribunal S/o.S.V.Narayanan, No.6, Gandhi Street, Vanuvampet, Chennai 91 working as Vocational Instructor (Machinist), Central Training Institute, Chennai 32 and 2 Others ..

Respondent(s)

WMP NO. 31209 of 2019 For Petitioner(s):

M/s.V.Vijay Shankar N.Balamuralikrishnan S.Mahesh K.S.Saravanan For Respondent(s):

R1 - Tribunal Notice Sent Service Awaited Reg Rr2 & 3 Not Ready Pvt Notice Permitted Proof Filed R-2 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Ministry of Labour, New Delhi R-3 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL Directorate General of Employment and Training, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi WMP NO. 31210 of 2019 For Petitioner(s):

M/s.V.Vijay Shankar N.Balamuralikrishnan S.Mahesh K.S.Saravanan For Respondent(s):

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.S.Sundar J.) These petitions are filed to condone the delay of 401 days in representing the Review Petition SR Nos. 30342 & 30343 of 2018 in WP.No. 28404 of 2016 and 30343 of 2018 in WP.No. 28405 of 2016 respectively.

2. Despite notice being served on the respondents, there is no representation.

3. This Court is fully convinced with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. The delay is explained to the satisfaction of this Court.

4. In view of the above, these miscellaneous petitions are ordered.

(S.S.SUNDAR J.) (RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN J.) 21-01-2025 ak