← Library
Madras High CourtWP/18132/2025disposed of

K.Renganathan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2025-08-07Honourable Mr.Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.08.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY K. Renganathan ... Petitioner vs.

1.

The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Mayiladuthurai, Tamil Nadu - 609 001.

The Inspector of Police, Mayiladuthurai Police Station, Mayiladuthurai, Tamil Nadu - 609 001.

Selvam 4.

The Thasildar, Mayiladuthurai Taluk Office, Mayiladuthurai - 609 001.

(R4 impleaded vide order dated 07.08.2025 in W.M.P.No.23029 of 2025) ... Respondents Prayer: This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representations dated 04.04.2025 and 11.04.2025 and to provide necessary police protection to conduct the survey in respect of the 1/4

petitioner's property situated at New Survey No.145/1B, Old Survey No.145/1, Mela Street, Aruvapadi Village, Mayiladuthurai District. For Petitioner : Mr. A. Raja Mohamed For RR 1 to 3 : Dr. C.E. Pratap, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ******

O R D E R

The writ petition is filed for a direction to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 04.04.2025 and 11.04.2025. In the said representations, the petitioner has requested to provide necessary police protection to conduct the survey in respect of the petitioner's property. The averments contained in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition would itself reveal that, when the Government Surveyor went to the particular piece of land for surveying it, the third respondent herein obstructed the same. When there is a dispute with reference to the title or possession and if third party obstructs, then the course open for the petitioner is to file a civil suit as against the third respondent, who is said to be interfering with the petitioner's possession and enjoyment, and depending on the orders of 2/4

the Civil Court for carrying out of survey or de-marking of the boundaries, the respondent police will give protection for the same in the lines of the orders of the Civil Court.

In view of the above, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the jurisdictional Civil Court in this regard, and if and when any interim order or final decree is passed in favour of the petitioner, the respondent police shall grant protection in terms of the order of the Civil Court. 4.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

07.08.2025 (2/2) stn 3/4

D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

stn To 1.

The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Mayiladuthurai, Tamil Nadu - 609 001.

The Inspector of Police, Mayiladuthurai Police Station, Mayiladuthurai, Tamil Nadu - 609 001.

The Thasildar, Mayiladuthurai Taluk Office, Mayiladuthurai - 609 001.

07.08.2025 (2/2) 4/4