Greeslin Margart v. Arul Nathan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.11.2019 CORAM :

The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY C.R.P.No.2806 of 2014 Greeslin Margart ... Petitioner Vs.

Arul Nathan ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order made in O.S.(SR).No.1334 of 2014 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Arakkonam. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Senthil Kumar - no appearance For Respondent : Not ready in notice

O R D E R

When the matter was listed for hearing on 04.11.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was adjourned to the next week. Thereafter, when the matter was listed for hearing on 11.11.2019 also, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption "for dismissal" on 12.11.2019. Though the matter has been listed under the caption "for dismissal", today also there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Civil Revision Petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar va https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The District Munsif, Arakkonam.

C.R.P.No.2806 of 2014 SPD(CO) CS/02/12/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/