← Library
Madras High CourtIP/13/2019adjudicated

N.Ekambaram v. I

2019-08-01Master6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16-12-2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI AND APPLN NO. 109 OF 2022,APPLN NO. 114 OF 2022,APPLN NO. 115 OF 2022,APPLN NO. 116 OF 2022 N.EKAMBARAM S/O.S.K.NATARAJAN, RESIDING AT OLD NO.7, NEW NO.9 MANNAPAN LANE, OLD WASHERMANPET, CHENNAI 600 021 APPELLANT(S) Vs I I RESPONDENT(S) THE OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE APPLICANT(S) Vs N.EKAMBARAM REPRESENTING THE ESTATE OF N.EKAMBARAM. AND ANOTHER RESPONDENT(S) THE OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE APPLICANT(S)

Vs N.EKAMBARAM REPRESENTING THE ESTATE OF N.EKAMBARAM. AND ANOTHER RESPONDENT(S) THE OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE APPLICANT(S) Vs N.EKAMBARAM REPRESENTING THE ESTATE OF N.EKAMBARAM. AND ANOTHER RESPONDENT(S) THE OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE APPLICANT(S) Vs N.EKAMBARAM REPRESENTING THE ESTATE OF N.EKAMBARAM. AND ANOTHER RESPONDENT(S) For Appellant(s):

K.V.ANANTHAKRISHNAN V.CHANDRASEKAR-MS/751/1980 K.P.MURALIDHARAN-MS/645/2000 A.JANANI-MS/1527/2014 FOR APPLICANT FOR R1 M/S.K.C.KRISHNAMOORTHY S.V.BADRIAH FOR R2 K.V.ANANTHAKRISHNAN V.CHANDRASEKAR-MS/751/1980 K.P.MURALIDHARAN-MS/645/2000 A.JANANI-MS/1527/2014 FOR APPLICANT FOR R1 S.V.BADRIAH-MS/93/2016 M/S.K.C.KRISHNAMOORTHY S.V.BADRIAH FOR R2 K.V.ANANTHAKRISHNAN V.CHANDRASEKAR-MS/751/1980 K.P.MURALIDHARAN-MS/645/2000 A.JANANI-MS/1527/2014 FOR APPLICANT FOR R1

M/S.K.C.KRISHNAMOORTHY S.V.BADRIAH FOR R2 K.V.ANANTHAKRISHNAN V.CHANDRASEKAR-MS/751/1980 K.P.MURALIDHARAN-MS/645/2000 A.JANANI-MS/1527/2014 FOR APPLICANT FOR R1 M/S.K.C.KRISHNAMOORTHY S.V.BADRIAH FOR R2

ORDER

The matter has been referred back to the Court by the learned Master. 2.Mr.K.V.Ananthakrishnan, the learned Official Assignee submits that on behalf of the Official Assignee, evidence has already been recorded before the learned Master. It is an application to set aside the same filed within a period of two years. 3.The objection taken by the learned Master was that the original sale deed of the second respondent was not produced at the time of marking documents and it is only a Photostat copy which was certified to be exhibited. Therefore, recording the objection of the learned counsel for the Official Assignee, the matter has been referred back to this Court.

4.The learned counsel for the second respondent submits that either the original sale

deed would be marked or a certified copy of the same would be marked. In the event of marking the certified copy, the learned counsel also undertakes to produce the original sale deed for the purposes of verification by the learned Master who shall verify the original and return the same to the learned counsel for the second respondent. 5.Post the matter before the learned Master on 09.01.2025. 16-12-2024 ata To

1. I I

1. N.EKAMBARAM

2. P.KARUNAKAR OLD NO.18/3, NEW NO.12, KAILAYA STREET, OLD WASHERMENPET, CHENNAI-600 021.

1. N.EKAMBARAM

2. P.KARUNAKAR OLD NO.18/3, NEW NO.12, KAILAYA STREET, OLD WASHERMENPET, CHENNAI-600 021.

1. N.EKAMBARAM

2. P.KARUNAKAR OLD NO.18/3, NEW NO.12, KAILAYA STREET, OLD WASHERMENPET, CHENNAI-600 021.

1. N.EKAMBARAM

2. P.KARUNAKAR OLD NO.18/3, NEW NO.12, KAILAYA STREET, OLD WASHERMENPET, CHENNAI-600 021.