← Library
Madras High CourtWP/1212/2012dismissed as infructuous

V.Karthik v. The Member Secretary

2015-10-05Honourable Mr Justice M. Jaichandren3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 5.10.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.1212 of 2012 V.KARTHIK [ PETITIONER ] Vs 1 THE MEMBER SECRETARY ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION CHANDRALOK BUILDING, 7TH FLOOR, JANPATH NEW DELHI-1.

2 THE SOUTHERN REGIONAL OFFICER SOUTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION SHASTRI BHAWAN, HADDOWS ROAD, CHENNAI-600 006.

3 THE COMMISSIONER OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION GUINDY, CHENNAI-600 025.

4 CONSORTIUM OF SELF FINANCING PROFESSIONAL ARTS AND SCIENCE COLLEGE IN TAMIL NADU, CHENNAI-600 014.

5 THE REGISTRAR ANNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY TIRUCHIRAPPALLI, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI.

6 PAVENDAR BHARATHIDHASAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY MATHUR, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI-620 024 REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL MR.MURUGU MOHANKUMAR.

7 THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS ANNA UNIVERSITY GUINDY CHENNAI-600 025.

[ RESPONDENTS ]

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records from the 1st Respondent relating to the impugned regulations in their approval process hand book 2011-12 Appendix-1 in clause 1.2.1 dated 10.12.2010 for the academic year 2011-12 in so far as it relates to the insistence of minimum eligibility of 50% marks in the qualifying examination and the consequential circular of the 3rd Respondent in No.4111/J4/2011 dated 14.06.2011 quash the same and direct the Respondents to approve the admission of the petitioners to MBA course from the academic year 2011-12 in the 6th Respondent College.

For petitioner : Mr.B.Rabu Manohar For respondents : Mrs.A.L.Gandhimathi for R1 to R3 Mr.M.Vijayakumar for R5 and R7

O R D E R

At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous.

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected M.P.Nos.1, 2 and 3 of 2012 are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar lan

To:

1 THE MEMBER SECRETARY ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION CHANDRALOK BUILDING, 7TH FLOOR, JANPATH NEW DELHI-1.

2 THE SOUTHERN REGIONAL OFFICER SOUTHERN REGIONAL OFFICE ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION SHASTRI BHAWAN, HADDOWS ROAD, CHENNAI-600 006.

3 THE COMMISSIONER OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION GUINDY, CHENNAI-600 025.

4 CONSORTIUM OF SELF FINANCING PROFESSIONAL ARTS AND SCIENCE COLLEGE IN TAMIL NADU, CHENNAI-600 014.

5 THE REGISTRAR ANNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY TIRUCHIRAPPALLI TIRUCHIRAPPALLI.

6 PAVENDAR BHARATHIDHASAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY MATHUR, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI-620 024 REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL MR.MURUGU MOHANKUMAR.

7 THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS ANNA UNIVERSITY GUINDY CHENNAI-600 025.

+1cc to Mr.M. Vijayakumar, Advocate, S.R.No.53878 +1cc to M/s.AL. Gandhimathi, Advocate, S.R.No.53983 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.54043 BVR(CO) EU(29/10/2015 Writ Petition No.1212 of 2012