V.Sridharan v. The Official Assignee

Appln.Nos.93, 119 of 2022 Appln.Nos.93, 119 of 2022 in I.P.No.74 of 1999 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

These two applications are presented by the ex-insolvent to modify the order dated 17.07.2019 in Appln.No.70 of 2019 and to direct the respondent to pay the balance reserve amount of Rs.10,000/- to the applicant.

2. The Official Assignee has filed a report dated 18.08.2022. In paragraph 3 thereof, it is stated that the Official Assignee had prayed in Appln.No.70 of 2019 that a sum of Rs.8,38,026/- be reserved to pay the secured creditor KBF. In paragraph 4 of the said report, it is further stated that the order of the Court inadvertently mentioned the amount as Rs.8,28,026/- instead of Rs.8,38,026/-.

3. From the above report, it is clear that the order contains a clerical or typographical error which warrants correction. Accordingly, both these applications are allowed as prayed for. Consequently, the Registry is directed to re-issue the order dated 17.07.2019 in Appln.No.70 of 2019 by modifying the amount mentioned in paragraph 11 thereof as Rs.8,38,026/- instead of Rs.8,28,026/-. Appln.No.93 of 2022 is allowed by directing that the balance reserve amount of Rs.10,000/- be paid by the respondent to the applicant / discharged insolvent in view of the order of discharge dated 17.07.2022. 05.09.2022 rna https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

Appln.Nos.93, 119 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

rna Appln.Nos.93, 119 of 2022 in I.P.No.74 of 1999 05.09.2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2