Madras High CourtWP/4979/2015disposed of

Thiru.N.K.Palanisamy, v. The Commissioner For

2015-03-04Honourable Mr Justice T. S. Sivagnanam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 04.03.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P. No.4979 of 2015 N.K.Palanisamy .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner for Land Administration Land Administration Ezhilagam Chepauk, Chennai. 5 2.S.Palanisamy 3.S.Subramani [R2 & R3 are impleaded as per order in M.P.No.1 of 2015 in WP.4979/2015] .. Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent herein to consider the revision filed by the petitioner dated 14.7.2014 and representation dated 23.12.2014, conduct enquiry and pass orders in accordance with law within a time frame fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Edwin prabakar For Respondents : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan-R1 Special Govt. Pleader

O R D E R

By consent of the learned counsel on either side, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

2.Heard Mr.A.Edwin prabakar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for the first respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition for issuance of a Writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider the revision filed by the petitioner dated 14.7.2014 and representation dated 23.12.2014, conduct enquiry and pass orders in accordance with law.

4.Aggrieved by the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Land Reform, Erode dated 03.07.2014, the petitioner has filed a Revision Petition before the first respondent on 14.07.2014 and since the same has not been disposed of, the petitioner has approached this Court.

5.It is seen that in the Revision Petition, the names of respondents 2 & 3 herein have not been included. Therefore, there will be a direction to the petitioner to file a Miscellaneous Petition, impleading the private respondents as respondents in the Revision Petition and the first respondent shall allow the said Miscellaneous Petition, implead the parties and thereafter issue notice to the petitioner and the respondents, hear the Revision Petition and decide the matter on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date on which the petitioner filed a Petition for impleading the private respondents. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rpa To 1.The Commissioner for Land Administration Land Administration Ezhilagam Chepauk, Chennai. 5 1 cc to Mr. A.Edwin Prabakar,Advocate, SR.No.12138 W.P. No.4979 of 2015 ala(co) pmk.23.3.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/