R.Rajan v. The Tahsildar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN R.Rajam ...

Petitioner versus The Tahsildar Thiruvannamalai Taluk Thiruvannamalai District ...

Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 17.04.2025 seeking for issuance of patta with respect to the Grama Natham property situated at Village No.45, Old S.No.20/4, New S.No.20/17, Arasudaiyampattu, Meyyur, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District. For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Himavanth For Respondents :

Mr.K.H.Ravikumar Government Advocate 1/4

ORDER

Today, the matter is listed under the caption "for being mentioned" at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has filed a writ petition for seeking writ of mandamus and the same was ordered on 15.05.2025, however, there was a typographical error occurred in the order i.e., the petitioner's name was wrongly mentioned as R.Rajan instead of R.Rajam and also the initial of the petitioner's counsel was wrongly mentioned as Mr.H.Himavanth instead of Mr.M.Himavanth. Hence, he prays to issue a fresh order copy after making necessary corrections, wherever it is applicable.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. Registry is directed to carry out the aforesaid corrections wherever it is applicable and issue fresh order copy.

09.06.2025 Speaking order : Yes/No Index : Yes / No : Yes / No ssi 2/4

To:

The Tahsildar Thiruvannamalai Taluk Thiruvannamalai District 3/4

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN , J.

ssi 09.06.2025 4/4