1. Subramani(Died) v. 1. Murugan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.02.2023 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA S.A.No.154 of 2001

1. Subramani (died)

2. Kumaresan

3. Ellamal

4. Dhanalakshmi

5. Poonambalakamaraj

6. Parameswari ...Appellants [A3 to A6 brought on record as LRs of the deceased A1 vide Court order dated 21.09.2022 made in C.M.P.Nos.463 to 468 of 2012, 554/2012 in S.A.No.154 of 2007 [KRJ] Vs.

1. Murugan

2. Jayalakshmi

3. Natarajan

4. Munusamy

5. Kamsalai

6. Annamalai

7. Varadharaj

8. Muthulakshmi

9. Sakthivel 10.Kalaivani 11.Amirthavalli 12.Sundravalli 13.Bharathiraj [R5 to 13 are brought on record as Lrs of the deceased R4 vide Court order dated 21.09.2022 made in C.M.P.Nos.463 to 468 of 2012 and 554 of 2012 in S.No.154/01] [KRJ]

...Respondents

Prayer:- This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.55 of 2000 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Tiruvannamalai dated 06.09.2000 reversing the judgment and decree in O.S.No.337 of 1990 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Tiruvannamalai dated 07.01.2000. For Appellant : Mr.G.Rajan - No Appearance For Respondents- : Mr.Kabirdas - No Appearance 5 to 13 For Respondents : Served-No Appearance 1 to 3 For Respondent-4 : Died

J U D G M E N T

Since there is no representation on behalf of the appellants on earlier occasions, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal".

2.

Once again, though the matter is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation on behalf of the appellant either in person or through counsel. The Second Appeal is therefore dismissed for default. No costs.

03.02.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No srn

To

1. The Additional District Judge, Tiruvannamalai

2. The Principal District Munsif, Tiruvannamalai

3. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras

P.T.ASHA.J, srn S.A.No.154 of 2001 03.02.2023