← Library
Madras High CourtWP/18273/2026dismissed

Asaraf Ali v. The District Collector

2026-06-10Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran,Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N. MALA Writ Petition No. 18273 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos. 19610 & 19611 of 2026

1. Asaraf Ali

2. Jaibunisha

3. Shagul Hamed

4. Rahamath Kani

5. Faisur Rahuman

6. Suguna

7. Mohammed Ansari

8. Abdul Raseed

9. Mohammed Jakkiriya 10.Mohammed Imran 11.Ribayutheen 12.Iqbal 13.Fathima 14.Ashik Ali 15.Ramanathan 16.Manobala 17.Tahaa ..Petitioners Vs

1. The District Collector Office of the District collector Office,

2. The District Revenue Officer District -level Review committee under G.O. 540

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer District -level Appellate Committee under G.O. 40

4. The Tahsildar Tharangambadi, Mayiladuthurai District

5. The Revenue Inspector Thiruvilayattam Circle, Tharangambadi Taluk, Tharangambadi

6. K.Chandrasekaran ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the official respondents to provide alternate lands to the petitioners similar on par with those residing at survey No.134/1 , Kiliyanur Village, Tharangambadi Taluk, Mayiladuthurai District.

For Petitioners:

Mr.J.Pothiraj For Respondents:

Mr.B.Sivakollappan Government Advocate for R1 to R5

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by Dr.G.Jayachandran J.) In a Public Interest Litigation filed by one Chandrasekar of Agaravallam, Tharangambadi, this Court on 24.03.2026 had directed the official respondents to act upon the Section 6 notice issued under the Tamil Nadu Encroachment Act, 1905, to the private respondents within a period of four weeks.

2.

In the said writ petition, the present encroachers were arrayed as respondents 6 to 22. The First Bench of this Court, in its aforesaid order dated 24.03.2026, recorded the plea of the respondents that out of twenty two encroachers, fifteen of them were running commercial shops, while seven were utilizing the premises for residential purposes. Insofar as the persons who were residing on the encroached land are concerned, the First Bench protected their interest by holding that they were entitled for rehabilitation. This being the factual position, the same respondents 6 to 22 as in the writ petition in W.P.No.30216 of 2025, are before this Court, claiming that since they are all residing on the encroached land, a Writ of Mandamus may be issued to the authorities to provide them alternate lands.

3.

On a perusal of the earlier order of this Court mentioned above, it is clear that only those encroachers who were residing on Government lands were given protection. However, taking advantage of the said protection given to the residents on the encroached land, the petitioners, except two, who are running commercial activities have now come before this Court seeking alternate land, which this Court finds legally untenable. The notice issued for eviction itself discloses the nature of their enjoyment. The petitioners, who are encroachers of a water body, are in the larger interest of the public, liable to vacate and find an alternate place by themselves.

4.

No encroacher can claim alternate accommodation as a matter of right before being evicted from a water body. Any such claim, if entertained, would place a premium on an illegal encroachment and impede the restoration of public resources. Hence, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as devoid of merits. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.

5.

The authorities are directed to implement the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.30216 of 2025 dated 24.03.2026, forthwith, without further delay.

(Dr.G.J.,J.) (N.M.,J.) 10-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order rpl To

1. The District Collector Office of the District Collector Office,

2. The District Revenue Officer District -level Review committee, under G.O. 540

3. The Revenue Divisional officer District -level Appellate Committee, under G.O. 40

4. The Tahsildar Tharangambadi,

5. The Revenue Inspector Thiruvilayattam Circle, Tharangambadi Taluk, Tharangambadi.

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN J.

and N.MALA J.

rpl Writ Petition No. 18273 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos. 19610 & 19611 of 2026 10-06-2026