← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/15299/2025granted

R.Purushothaman v. State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police

2025-05-15Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 15.05.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.15299 of 2025 R.Purushothaman .. Petitioner Vs.

The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Kalambur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.

(Crime No.197 of 2025) .. Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.197 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For petitioner : Mr.Deepak Kumar C For Respondent : Mr.V.Meganathan Government Advocate(Criminal Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 115 (2), 296 (b), 326 (f), 351 (2) of BNS r/w 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.197 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.

Page No.1 of 6

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioner assaulted the defacto complainant and abused her in filthy language. Hence, the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he had been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required and sought for anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and on instructions submitted that the injured has been treated as out patient.

5.Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions and accordingly, he Page No.2 of 6

is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Polur, Tiruvannamalai District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the Police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that:

[a] if the petitioner fails to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled;

[b] The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders;

[d] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the defacto complainant and witnesses and shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

Page No.3 of 6

[e] the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a Police office as and when required; [f] the petitioner to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for Police custody beyond the first fifteen days, he shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard; [g] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[h] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[i] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

15.05.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No rkp/ep Page No.4 of 6

To 1.The Inspector of Police, Kalambur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.

2.The Judicial Magistrate, Polur, Tiruvannamalai District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

Page No.5 of 6

ep/rkp Crl.O.P.No.15299 of 2025 15.05.2025 Page No.6 of 6