Madras High CourtWP/12126/2014dismissed

N.Balasubramanian, v. The Special Deputy Collector,

2021-11-26Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26-11-2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP NO.12126 OF 2014 AND MP NO.1 OF 2014 N.Balasubramanian .. Petitioner .VS.

1. The Special Deputy Collector, Revenue Court, Mannargudi - 614 001, Thiruvarur District.

2. R.Sanmugam .. Respondents Prayer:

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order in proceedings P.No.7 of 2011 dated 24.10.2013 passed by the first respondent and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Meenakshi Sundaram For Respondent-1 : Mr.C.Jayaprakash, Government Advocate.

For Respondent-2 : Ms.P.T.Rama Devi

O R D E R

The landlord approached the Mannargudi Revenue Court/ Special Deputy Collector with the complaint that the cultivating tenant / petitioner has not paid the lease arrears amount to the landlord.

2. The Revenue Court considered the issues and formed an https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

opinion that the petitioner has not paid the lease arrears and further not filed any petition for extension of time to settle the lease amount. When the said fact is ascertained through documents, the Revenue Court passed an order, directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.36,637.50.

3. The writ petition was filed in the year 2014. The petitioner has not stated any acceptable reason for the purpose of assailing the order impugned. The second respondent, admittedly, filed an application under Rule 3(4)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Landlord Protection Act, 1956 to evict the petitioner for non-payment of lease amount for the period of Fasli 1417 to 1420. Further, there is a provision for revision of the said order and the petitioner has not filed any such revision petition.

4. The Revenue Court adjudicated the issues and the petitioner could not able to produce any documents to establish the allegations raised by the landlord.

5. This being the factum, the petitioner has not raised any acceptable ground for the purpose of filing the present writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Svn To The Special Deputy Collector, Revenue Court, Mannargudi - 614 001, Thiruvarur District.

+1cc to Ms.P.T.Rama Devi, Advocate, S.R.No.61862 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.62209 WP 12126 of 2014 SSI(CO) PM/09/12/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/