Madras High CourtWP/9782/2004dismissed as infructuous

R. Veerananjappan v. Tirupur Municipality

2017-11-13Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.11.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.Nos.9782 to 9785 of 2004 & W.P.M.P.Nos.11442 to 11445 of 2004 R. Veerananjappan @ S.R.Senthil Kumar .. Petitioner in all W.Ps.

Versus

1. The Tirupur Municipality rep. by its Commissioner, Tirupur - 641 604.

2. The Taxation Appeal Committee, Municipality Buildings, Tirupur - 641 604.

Prayer in W.P.No.9782 of 2004: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari to quash the notice of demand for property tax No.53901 for the period from I Half 2002-2003 to II Half 2002-2003 after calling for the records on the file of first respondent.

Prayer in W.P.No.9783 of 2004: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari to quash the notice of demand for property tax No.53902 for the period from I Half 2002-2003 to II Half 2002-2003 after calling for the records on the file of first respondent.

Prayer in W.P.No.9784 of 2004: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari to quash the notice of demand for property tax No.88155 for the period from I Half 2003-2004 to II Half 2003-2004 after calling for the records on the file of first respondent.

Prayer in W.P.No.9785 of 2004: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari to quash the notice of demand for property tax No.88156 for the period from I Half 2003-2004 to II Half 2003-2004 after calling for the records on the file of first respondent.

For Petitioner: Mr.M.Md.Hasan (in all W.Ps.) For Mr.B.Ramamurthy For Respondents: Mr.G.Sankaran for R1 (in all W.Ps.) Mr.O.Selvam, G.A. for R2 (in all W.Ps.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C O M M O N O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the prayer sought for in all the Writ Petitions has become infructuous and he has made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the above submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pvs To

1. The Tirupur Municipality rep. by its Commissioner, Tirupur - 641 604.

2. The Taxation Appeal Committee, Municipality Buildings, Tirupur - 641 604.

W.P.Nos.9782 to 9785 of 2004 & W.P.M.P.Nos.11442 to 11445 of 2004 RR(CO) EU(22/12/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/